Itse asiassa minustakin Alonso on hyvä sopeutumaan ja mietinkin tässä yksi päivä, että harvoin kuulee Alonson valittavan ettei löydy säätöjä tai ei saa renkaita toimimaan. Ehkä Stella on oikeilla jäljillä.
Katsoin alkuperäisen haastattelun Sport.es-sivustolta ja tuo oli vain pieni pätkä jutusta. Kyllä siellä Kimiä myös kehuttiin monella lailla.
Mutta tässä on pari viikkoa sitten ilmestyneestä toisen espanjalais-lehden haastattelusta (google)-käännöstä. Huonoa kieltä, mutta selvän saa. Laitoin sen lähinnä siksi, että huomaa kuinka espanjalaistoimittaja yrittää kaikkensa, että Stella nostaisi Alonson Kimiä paremmaksi. Mutta Stella ei mene lankaan eli kertoo siitä, että arvostaa Kimiä kovasti.
Q: But many drivers do not need as much information as Kimi no?
A: Look, the thing is that Kimi did not talk much, which does not mean they have less information. From my point of view is one of the pilots with clearer vision of what he had at his disposal and how was the car, you only needed to pass the information with less words, nothing more. It is a matter of code.
Q. I will apologize, but I have to ask which of the three was most impressive (the temeletría indicates who accelerates before, which hinders later, really, who does everything better in a sense)
A: - laughter I had with Fernando even touch on are starting, but a common feature of all three is that they have a great car control, ability to get great feedback from the car, how you're behaving, knowing your limits , which allows me to move closer to that limit. That is what you see in the telemetry.
Q: As you know, Fernando talks a lot, ask how all the drivers, likes to be very knowledgeable in the race ...
A: Look, Schumacher also used to talk a lot on the radio, liked having a lot of information and in this sense is different from Raikkonen. He just wanted to get the essentials and also in a synthetic form and, if possible, explained without exaltation, all in very quiet and calm. Sometimes you just gestures, which is also a form of communication. Michael needed a lot more information was much more dialectical, which is also the style of Fernando and I have to adapt to what the pilot needs, is part of my job.
Q: Which of the three has been or is more technical or intuitive? What defines them?
R: Schumacher course it was very intuitive, although I used to use and require the analysis and technical dialogue, if we passed from this to this to know why he liked it and it no other way. With Kimi, everything was much more based on intuition. I think Fernando is in the middle of the two, his work is much more based on intuition but analysis can be done with it, that is, Michael had many dialects, with Fernando, the details are not substantial it is better to remove them, if they are useful to achieve the objective, absolutely have to tell them.
